In this segment I discuss CRT and present two articles, one for and one against. Then I end the segment giving my own view on this practice.
Definition of CRT
https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory
Article for CRT
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/01/us/critical-race-theory-explainer-trnd/index.html
Article against CRT
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/29/critical-race-theory-is-a-classic-communist-divide-and-conquer-tactic/
This stands as yet another manipulative use of power by a prominent figure that is walking in lockstep with the rest of these global elites that have proven, by their actions, are masking self interest with humanitarianism. I don’t see a spiritual leader offering compassionate guidance, I see a person in a position of great power using shame to coerce compliance. Coercion is aggression and aggression is unjustifiable against another human being period. Anyone that uses shame under the guise of leadership, exposes their lack of respect for the individual sovereignty of the people they’re responsible for leading.
When you abandon truth and science uncontrolled chaos will ensue and the only individuals who would implement this as a strategy do it for themselves at the expense of others.
How many times are you going to obey the same unconstitutional statistically insignificant edict before you realize the insanity of doing so? If the goal was maximum mitigating effectiveness then we would first review the proven available data and then make educated decisions based on what the data suggests. This would be a reasonable strategy as it would allow us to make the necessary changes based on the utilization of the scientific method instead of allowing politics and emotion to pervert rational thought.
EPISODE 52: THE ART OF WAR EQUALS DECEPTION
What causes quarrels and what causes fights among you? Is it not this, that your passions are at war within you?2 You desire and do not have, so you murder. You covet and cannot obtain, so you fight and quarrel. You do not have, because you do not ask. 3 You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions. James 4:1-3 ESV
EPISODE 50: THEY KNOW THEIR GUN-LAWS DON’T WORK
Let me begin by saying this in hopes that you understand me clearly, “no matter what they say their goal is not to keep you safe.” As the great Thomas Sowell says and I’m paraphrasing, “the best society can achieve are trade-offs.” Meaning, perfection, or a utopian society is out of reach to imperfect people. We must always strive to ensure that the trade-offs produce the greatest good for our populace as a whole; a net positive if you will. Our first and second amendments are excellent examples of a net positive trade-off. But to illustrate this point better let me show you how removing either of these amendments would present a net negative trade-off as this trade-off would produce the same result. Let’s say you don’t like what another citizen has to say so you empower a government body to punish that citizen if they continue to speak in a way you deem offensive. Now let’s say that you notice your neighbor owns a ...
EPISODE 49: IT’S ALWAYS BEEN ABOUT CONTROL
The prevailing tyrannical question has always been, “how do we control effectively control the populace”? That’s it, in a nutshell, that’s all there is to it. They begin with kindness, then bribery and when that doesn’t yield the desired results, they slide right into force without hesitation. History teaches us that this tactic has never worked in the long run and, in fact, has precipitated every empirical collapse without exception. However, being students of authoritarianism somehow precludes one from being a student of history and ultimately they end up falling into the same trappings as their historical predecessors. It would be comical if this repeated process didn’t also cost the lives of untold millions of innocents while the most deserving of consequence seldom suffer the fruits of their own tyranny.
